Copier Purchase: Study and Recommendations

SunRiver Corporation currently uses one copying machine for a staff of 32. The copier's usable life is 2 years with a maximum volume of 12,000 copies per month. The machine is almost 2-1/2 years old and the current monthly volume is 16,000. The result is a copier with a lot of down-time and frequent service calls. The following is a recommendation for the purchase of a new copier.

Requirements for Copier Purchase

The copiers chosen for comparison are all approximately the same price, are all excellent in copy quality, and all have standard features such as duplexing, automatic sheet feeders, and large bin capacities. The requirements for selecting the copiers for comparison are:

Comparisons of Copiers

The copiers chosen for comparison are the Konica 4290, Ricoh 5560, and Harris/3M 6242. These copiers were chosen because they copy at least 42 copies per minute (cpm) and have a minimum volume of 30,000 copies per month; they utilize the same special features; they cost approximately the same; and they are available for evaluation in our office.

Speed and volume. The Konica 4290 and Harris/3M 6242 have speeds of 42 cpm and the Ricoh has a speed of 40 cpm. However, the Richo's Automatic Document Feeder (ADF) had the fastest copying speed: 22 cpm, and the Konica had the slowest ADF copying speed: 19 cpm. This is a noticeable difference during demonstrations. All three copiers had a minimum volume of 30,000 copies per month with the Harris/3M having the highest volume of 50,000 per month.

Special features. All three copiers had enlargement/reduction features with pre-set ratios. The Konica has the simplest display panel whereas the Ricoh offers more options for reduction/enlargement. The Harris/3M display had picture displays to show reduction but not enlargement. The Ricoh and Harris/3M had the book copy feature which allows user to copy two facing book pages without repositioning the book. The Ricoh is the only model that offers photo mode which is a feature that automatically adjusts for photography reproduction. All three copiers have 20-bin sorters but the Harris/3M's 20-bin sorter is an option at additional cost. The large capacity cassette (LCC) is an option included in the Konica's and Ricoh's final cost, but the Harris/3M did not include the LCC in the final cost. The Ricoh and Konica offer paper bin choices for 8-1/2" x 11" (letter), 8-1/2" x 14" (legal), 11" x 17" (computer) while the Harris/3M requires changing out the trays to accommodate 11" x 17" paper.

Cost. When considering the cost of a copier, the customer needs to look at the cost per copy. Knowing the cost per copy can help determine if the consumer is getting the better deal. The price value of a machine can look good, but when you consider all the hidden costs, the long-term maintenance can be expensive. The following formula can produce the cost per copy:

	  Machine Cost
Supplies Cost
+ Maintenance Contract ---------------------- = Total Machine Cost Total Machine Cost/Number of Copies = Cost Per Copy
The machine cost is the actual purchase price. Supply costs are paper and machine supplies (specifically, toner, cartridges, silicon oil, cartridge bags, etc). The terms of the maintenance contract should be noted for inclusion of parts, labor and drum. Also, there is usually an additional charge or overage charge per copy after the maximum monthly volume is reached.

Office evaluation. Each machine was available for one week of demonstration in the office. The staff offered a variety of opinions on each machine's operation. The Konica received a lot of complaints because of the ADF's slow copy time and inability to load paper tray with transparencies. Transparencies had to be single-sheet feed. The Ricoh and Harris/3M received equal approval on ADF speed the Harris/3M had the fastest copy per minute. The Ricoh is the only machine that provided bins for all paper sizes.

                 COPIERS: FINANCIAL OVERVIEW

                          KONICA           HARRIS          RICOH
================================================================
Price                     $9,495          $12,000         $9,231
Copy Speed (cpm)              42               42             40
Monthly Volume            50,000           40,000         40,000
Yearly Maint. Contract    $3,936           $1,700         $2,656
-Overage Charge Per Copy     Yes              Yes             No
-Labor, Parts and Drum       Yes              Yes            Yes
 included
Service                     Good          Unknown      Excellent
Staff Approval              Poor             Good           Good
References                  Poor          Unknown      Excellent

Conclusions

The Konica was the simplest to understand in operation and is a good work horse machine for large jobs using letter size paper. But for more complex jobs involving legal and computer sized paper, it proved inefficient. The refences for the Konica were users with monthly volumes between 5,000 - 15,000 per month, which is not comparable with our projected monthly volume.

The Ricoh efficiently handled simple and complex copying jobs. It had paper bins for all sizes of paper and had quick automated paper selection. Its picture display panel was easy to understand and it had many more useable options than the other two copiers. The references for Ricoh used a monthly volume of 16,000 - 50,000 per month and were very informative papers.

The Harris/3M is as quick as the Ricoh but did not offer the option of the 11" x 17" tray. The display panels were easy to understand but were located in three different places on the machine. The prices of the Konica and Ricoh were comparable with the Harris/3M being the most expensive. The Konica and Ricoh are manufactured by their corporations, whereas the Harris/3M is manufactured by Sharp.

Recommendation

Due to total cost, special features, staff approval, and good references, I recommend the Ricoh FT5560. The alternative recommendation is the Konica 4290. The Harris/3M proved too expensive and insufficient data available for appraisal.
This information is owned and maintained by David A. McMurrey. For information on use, customization, or copies, e-mail davidm@austin.cc.tx.us or call (512) 476-4949.