Cause-Effect Discussion
Another important information structure often used in technical
communications is the discussion of causes and effects. Discussions like
these answer questions such as the following:
- What are (or were) the causes of this? How and why does (or did) this happen?
What brought about a situation, problem, or accident?
- What are (were or will be) the effects, results, or consequences of this? What will
happen if a certain situation or problem continues?
- How does this work? What causes this to function as it does?
- Why won't this thing work? What's wrong with it?
- What changes will occur if a certain plan or action is taken?
- How can a certain problem or situation be avoided?
- What are the advantages, benefits, or disadvantages of an action or object?
- What are one or more potential solutions to a problem?
Note: See the complete example of a causal
discussion.
Some examples: What causes tornadoes? What sorts of damage do tornadoes
cause? What will happen if the world continues to use petroleum resources
at its current rate? What were the causes of the Great Depression? What are
the effects of an economic recession? How does a photocopier work? What
makes a microwave oven work? (Does this sound like your seven-year-old?)
As you can see from these examples, we can discuss the causes and effects
of human or social processes, natural processes, mechanical or physical
processes, historical or economic processes, meteorological or biological
processes, and on and on.
If you think about it, there's not much difference between process
discussion and causal discussion. Both occur over time; steps in a process
often involve causes and effects. The distinction depends on your purpose
and emphasis: process discussions are primarily concerned with how
an event occurs; causal discussions, with why an event
occurs. Process discussion focuses on the chronology of something; causal
discussion focuses on the causes and effects. I can tell you step by step
how to take a photo or what events occur inside the camera when you take a
picture-that's process. But I can also explain to you what physical and
chemical principles are at work when you take a photo, what principles
actually enable you to take a photo-that's causal discussion. For some
topics, however, such as explaining tornadoes, it's almost impossible to
make a distinction. Here are some contrasting examples:
Subject Process discussion Causal discussion
Lightning How to safeguard home What natural phenomena
appliances from lightning cause lightning
Instruction How to set up understand- What causes instructions to
writing able instructions be unclear
Acquisition of How to help children Why certain children learn
language by learn language more learn language more
children rapidly rapidly
Growing tomatoes How to plant and care for Reasons why tomatoes
tomatoes are less productive
Air conditioning How cool air is produced Why your air conditioning
by conventional systems is costing you more this
summer
Here are some common reasons why we need to discuss causal and effects:
- We may need a record of the damage done by something. Photographs work,
but words may also be needed.
- We may need an account of the scientific principles at work in a process so that
we can understand what they are doing in an instructional procedure.
- We may need to understand the causes of something so we can have a better
understanding of how to control or eliminate it.
- We may need to understand the effects of something so that we will take it more
seriously, work to prevent it, or work to increased its likelihood.
Organization for Causal Discussions
How you organize the contents of a causal discussion depends on how many and
what combination of causes and effects you discuss:
- Single cause-single effect--A single cause can lead to a single effect; for
example, a radiator leak can cause the car to overheat.
- Multiple causes-single effect--Many different causes can be seen as leading to
one effect: for example, high unemployment, high interest rates, and high real
estate costs (causes) might lead to decreased real estate sales (effect).
- Single cause-multiple effects--A single cause can be seen as producing
numerous effects. For example, proponents of the greenhouse effect believe that
increased CO2 in the atmosphere (cause) will lead to changes in weather
patterns, higher temperatures, drought, increased storm activity, and higher sea
levels (effects).
- Sequential causes and effects--One cause can bring about an effect, which in
turn becomes the cause of another effect, and so on. For example, proponents of
the greenhouse effect argue that increased burning of fossil fuels (cause) leads
to increased CO2 in the atmosphere (effect) which in turn is the cause of less
thermal energy being reradiated out of the system (effect) which in turn becomes
the cause of increased global temperatures.
- Alternate causes and effects--Causes and effects can be alternating. For
example, if the car won't start (effect), it may be because of a dead battery
(alternate cause 1), no gas in the gas tank (alternate cause 2), or a faulty
solenoid (alternate cause 3).
Figure G-5. Organization of effects in a short
causal discussion.First, the cause is stated; then the effects are
discussed one after another.
Consider a simple example: imagine you want to discuss how a single situation has
led to a number of problems, in other words, one cause leading to several effects.
In a single paragraph, the first couple of sentences might focus on the cause; each
of the following sentences would focus on the effects. In an extended discussion,
there might be a paragraph on the cause, and a paragraph on each of the effects.
Take a look at the examples of organizational patterns like these in Figure G-5. The
schematic diagram of a causal discussion in Figure G-9 shows you how the
extended approach would look.
Discussing Causes and Effects
Actual discussion of causes and effects is not as immediately identifiable as
descriptive or process writing are. Typically, causal discussions talk about events
and describe things. What makes causal discussions distinctive is the use of
transitional words to indicate the causes and effects.
In the sentence "Increased deficit spending by the government leads to increased
inflation" the verb "leads to" establishes the connection between a cause and an
effect-actually, it establishes the two noun phrases as cause and effect,
respectively. In this excerpt, the connective "consequently" establishes a causal link
between the increasing domestic anger over the Vietnam war and Johnson's
decision not to seek reelection: "Meanwhile at home, anger, hostility, and outright
revolt against the war grew. Johnson, sensing he could not get reelected in this
atmosphere, consequently decided against running for another term."
Figure G-6 shows how heavily description can get involved in discussing causes
and effects; other examples in this section show how much process discussion gets
involved.
Figure G-6. Description in causal discussion: to
discuss the effects of the eruption of Mount St. Helen, much description
has to be used.
Figure G-7. Various types of cause-effect
relationships. The top example involves a single cause and single effect;
the middle example involves a single cause and multiple effects; the bottom
example involves a sequence of causes and effects (with each effect turning
into a cause).
Figure G-8. An extended causal discussion: focus
on a single cause for one or more paragraphs.
Format for Causal Discussions
Here are a few suggestions on format as they relate specifically to causal
discussions:
- Headings. If you write an extended causal discussion and have separate
paragraphs for each of the causes or effects, then the headings should signal
those causes. (See the examples in this section.) See the section on
headings for details.
- Lists. If you discuss sequential causes and effects, you're likely to need
in-sentence and vertical numbered lists. If you have multiple causes or effects
but no necessary order amongst them, then bulleted lists are appropriate. See
the section on lists for details.
- Graphics. Causal discussions often use conceptual diagrams to show the
relationships between the causes and effects. In these you give a spatial
representation of the causes and effects as they occur in time.
See the section on graphics for details.
- Style. As with any other technical writing, you treat numbers, symbols, and
abbreviations in process discussions the same. Exact measurement values
should be numerals, regardless whether they are below 10. See
the section on technical style for details.
Figure G-9. Schematic view of cause-effect
discussions. Remember that this is just a typical or common model for the
contents and organization--many others are possible.
Return to the table of contents for the TCM1603 Course Guide
(the online textbook for Austin Community College's online
technical writing course).
This information is owned and maintained by David A. McMurrey. For
information on use, customization, or copies, e-mail
davidm@austin.cc.tx.us or call (512) 476-4949.